Item detail
github.com

scanaislop/aislop

scanaislop/aislop is a ai code lint that RepoRadar is tracking in its Developer Tools section, currently rated Gold tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 10.0 out of 10.

Score8.5
Popularity1.0
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum7.0
Maturity6.6
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence8.0
Workflow potential10.0
Setup ease8.8

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for teams adopting Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or OpenCode who want a fast way to catch narrative comments, swallowed exceptions, hidden fallbacks, dead code, and other agent-made mess before it lands in main.

Who should use it

Teams reviewing AI-generated pull requests before they mergeDevelopers who want a deterministic gate for agent slop without adding another LLM to the runtime pathCI maintainers who need a fast score or JSON output for automated enforcementPower users who want to combine scan mode with selective auto-fix or agent-assisted cleanup

Who should skip it

Skip scanaislop/aislop if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.

About this signal

scanaislop/aislop is tracked by RepoRadar as a ai code lint in the Developer Tools section. It was first seen on 2026-06-29 and last updated on 2026-06-29. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and easy setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, scanaislop/aislop is strongest on workflow potential (10.0) and practical usefulness (9.0) and weakest on maturity (6.6) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the evidence RepoRadar has captured from captured source metadata. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned scanaislop/aislop a composite score of 8.5 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 1.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

The optional fix and agent subcommands can rewrite files or invoke external agent CLIs, so start with scan or ci mode on a disposable branch.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
coding-agentslintciquality-gatedeveloper-toolsmit