Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for developers and teams who want stronger control over when an agent can edit files, run commands, or advance to the next step, without hand-writing a new safety prompt for every task.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip statewright/statewright if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.
About this signal
statewright/statewright is tracked by RepoRadar as an agent project in the Coding Workflows section. First seen 2026-06-28; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-28. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, statewright/statewright is strongest on workflow potential (9.9) and practical usefulness (9.0) and weakest on setup ease (6.4) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The statewright/statewright record combines a 8.4/10 composite score with separate popularity (1.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
The default quickstart opens a hosted signup and API-key flow, so teams should review pricing and control-plane assumptions before org-wide rollout; Once a workflow unlocks edit or shell states, the agent is still executing real local actions inside those allowed bounds.