Item detail
github.com

microsoft/mcp-gateway

RepoRadar surfaced microsoft/mcp-gateway — a framework — into the Radar section, where it sits at Gold tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 10.0 out of 10.

Score8.9
Popularity78.0
Riskmedium
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity8.5
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential10.0
Setup ease4.2

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for platform teams that are moving from one-off MCP experiments to shared infrastructure: it gives them a cleaner way to route tool traffic, keep sessions sticky, and manage multiple servers without inventing the control plane from scratch.

Who should use it

platform teams developer infrastructure engineers MCP server operators teams standardizing tool access for agents

Who should skip it

Hold off on microsoft/mcp-gateway for mission-critical workflows without a containment strategy, explicit approvals, and a hands-on security review.

About this signal

microsoft/mcp-gateway is tracked by RepoRadar as a framework in the Radar section. It was first seen on 2026-06-19 and last updated on 2026-06-19. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and advanced setup difficulty. The standout signals for microsoft/mcp-gateway are workflow potential (10.0) and practical usefulness (9.0), while setup ease (4.2) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned microsoft/mcp-gateway a composite score of 8.9 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 78.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'medium' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

This gateway sits in the middle of agent tool traffic and can concentrate access to multiple MCP servers, so review its auth model and deployment boundary before routing sensitive tools through it.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
mcp kubernetes ai-infrastructure tool-routing platform-engineering
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-03T18:56:10Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

36 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-19 through 2026-08-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.9 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.0 current · +1.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)764 current · +24 net
GitHub stars764 exact observation
VersionNot reported by source
Last releaseNot reported by source
Maintenanceactive
Current riskmedium
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineMicrosoft Azure

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-038.99.0764mediumtry nowactive
2026-08-028.99.0764mediumtry nowactive
2026-08-018.99.0763mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-318.98.0Not recordedmediumtry nownot recorded
2026-07-308.98.0Not recordedmediumtry nownot recorded
2026-07-298.95.8758mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-07-288.95.5757mediumtry nowmaintained
2026-07-218.97.5745mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-208.97.5745mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-198.97.5745mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-188.97.5745mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-178.97.5745mediumtry nowactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 763 → 764.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 761 → 763. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 757 → 758.

stars changed

Stars changed: 745 → 757.

maintenance changed

Maintenance changed: active → maintained.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 744 → 745. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 740 → 744.