Item detail
github.com

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP is a framework that RepoRadar is tracking in its Radar section, currently rated Gold tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 10.0 out of 10.

Score8.9
Popularity86.0
Riskmedium
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity8.7
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential10.0
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

That matters because a lot of AI app demos still stop at generated code. A path from agent output to a live app with hosting and backend services is much more useful for builders who actually want to ship something.

Who should use it

AI app builders full-stack developers Tencent CloudBase users teams testing prompt-to-production workflows

Who should skip it

Pass on TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP if your environment cannot support the access controls and sandboxing this risk profile requires.

About this signal

TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP is tracked by RepoRadar as a framework in the Radar section. It was first seen on 2026-06-19 and last updated on 2026-06-19. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP is strongest on workflow potential (10.0) and practical usefulness (9.0) and weakest on setup ease (6.4) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP a composite score of 8.9 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 86.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'medium' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

This bridge is designed to create or modify real cloud resources and live app deployments, so start in a sandbox project and review permission scope before letting it touch production infrastructure.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
mcp deployment serverless ai-apps cloudbase
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-03T18:56:10Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

36 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-19 through 2026-08-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.9 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.0 current · +1.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)1,066 current · +17 net
GitHub stars1,066 exact observation
Versionv2.25.3
Last release2026-08-03T09:43:37Z
Maintenanceactive
Current riskmedium
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude Code, Model Context Protocol, PostgreSQL

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-038.99.01,066mediumtry nowactive
2026-08-028.99.01,065mediumtry nowactive
2026-08-018.99.01,065mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-318.98.0Not recordedmediumtry nownot recorded
2026-07-308.98.0Not recordedmediumtry nownot recorded
2026-07-298.99.01,064mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-288.99.01,064mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-218.99.01,057mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-208.99.01,057mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-198.99.01,057mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-188.99.01,057mediumtry nowactive
2026-07-178.99.01,057mediumtry nowactive

Why the record changed

version changed

Version changed: v2.25.2 → v2.25.3.

stars changed

Stars changed: 1065 → 1066.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 1064 → 1065. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

version changed

Version changed: v2.25.0 → v2.25.1.

version changed

Source-observed version changed: v2.24.1 → v2.25.0. Associated release timestamp: 2026-07-21T05:51:13Z → 2026-07-28T08:59:36Z. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

version changed

Version changed: v2.23.11 → v2.24.1.

integration changed

Integration changed: Model Context Protocol, PostgreSQL → Claude Code, Model Context Protocol, PostgreSQL.

stars changed

Stars changed: 1057 → 1064.

version changed

Version changed: v2.23.9 → v2.23.11.

stars changed

Stars changed: 1049 → 1057.