Item detail
github.com

Purewhiter/mobilegym

RepoRadar surfaced Purewhiter/mobilegym — an AI project — into the Evaluation section, where it sits at Gold tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.7 out of 10.

Score8.6
Popularity1.0
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty9.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity6.7
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential9.7
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for agent-research teams that want a verifiable, highly parallel Android GUI environment without maintaining a fleet of physical devices.

Who should use it

Agent-research teams training mobile GUI agents with GRPO or other online RL methods Benchmark authors who want a programmable state, not just screenshots, to grade against Mobile agent vendors comparing model families on the same 416 task templates AI labs that need a low-cost sandboxes for mobile-app workflows without provisioning real devices

Who should skip it

Skip Purewhiter/mobilegym if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.

About this signal

Purewhiter/mobilegym is tracked by RepoRadar as an AI project in the Evaluation section. It was first seen on 2026-06-22 and last updated on 2026-06-22. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. The standout signals for Purewhiter/mobilegym are workflow potential (9.7) and practical usefulness (9.0), while setup ease (6.4) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned Purewhiter/mobilegym a composite score of 8.6 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 1.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

The bundled training and benchmark data under mobilegym-data/ is CC BY-NC 4.0 non-commercial; commercial users should review LICENSE-DATA before redistributing the dataset, the code itself is Apache-2.0; The 256 parallel instances number is per server, so plan capacity and RAM before scaling beyond a single-node pilot.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
mobile android gui-agent simulation rl benchmark research apache-2.0
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-04T02:20:22Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

34 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-22 through 2026-08-04; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.6 current · +1.2 net
Repository momentum5.0 current · -2.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)742 current · +24 net
GitHub stars742 exact observation
Versionv0.1.0
Last release2026-06-26T18:28:31Z
Maintenancemaintained
Current riskconditional
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineNo structured integrations recorded

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-048.65.0742conditionaltry nowmaintained
2026-08-038.65.0742conditionaltry nowmaintained
2026-08-028.65.5743conditionaltry nowmaintained
2026-08-018.65.5743conditionaltry nowmaintained
2026-07-318.68.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-308.68.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-298.67.5740conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-288.67.5740conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-218.67.5727conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-208.67.5727conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-198.67.5727conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-188.67.5727conditionaltry nowactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 743 → 742.

stars changed

Stars changed: 727 → 740.

stars changed

Stars changed: 718 → 727.

popularity changed

Reconstructed from adjacent retained daily snapshots; no upstream cause is inferred. Popularity changed: 7.1 → 1.0.

tier changed

Reconstructed from adjacent retained daily snapshots; no upstream cause is inferred. Tier changed: Silver → Gold.

score changed

Reconstructed from adjacent retained daily snapshots; no upstream cause is inferred. Score changed: 7.4 → 8.6. Largest component movements: commercial workflow potential 8.5 → 9.7 (+1.2); maturity 5.6 → 6.7 (+1.1); usefulness 8 → 9 (+1.0). These retained scoring-input deltas account for the RepoRadar score movement; this scoring-accounting explanation does not infer an upstream cause.

risk changed

Reconstructed from adjacent retained daily snapshots; no upstream cause is inferred. Risk changed: low → conditional.