Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
For teams moving from experiments to production agent systems, Agno provides a coherent structure for tool use, orchestration, and guardrails instead of gluing ad hoc scripts together.
Where this stands now
agno-agi/agno ranks #8 of 19 tracked Agent Frameworks items by composite score (8.3 against a section median of 8.3). The section currently carries 14 Gold, 5 Silver. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-06-18 (91 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: novelty at the 16th percentile.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip agno-agi/agno if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.
About this signal
agno-agi/agno is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Agent Frameworks section. First seen 2026-06-18; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-18. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. The standout signals for agno-agi/agno are workflow potential (9.8) and practical usefulness (9.0), while setup ease (6.4) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The agno-agi/agno record combines a 8.3/10 composite score with separate popularity (93.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Questions worth asking before you adopt this
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
agent tools can access external APIs and files when configured with broad credentials; custom workflows can invoke code execution in connected environments.