Item detail
github.com

HKUDS/nanobot

HKUDS/nanobot is a developer tool that RepoRadar is tracking in its Agent Frameworks section, currently rated Gold tier with a 'watch' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 8.6 out of 10.

Score7.8
Popularity74.0
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty7.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity7.7
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential8.6
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for users who want a self-owned agent workbench rather than another hosted chat app: test it locally with dummy credentials and one low-risk workflow before connecting real chat, email, or file access.

Who should use it

personal automation users agent-framework evaluators self-hosted AI users workflow builders

Who should skip it

Hold off on HKUDS/nanobot until it graduates from watchlist status with stronger evidence.

About this signal

HKUDS/nanobot is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Agent Frameworks section. It was first seen on 2026-06-16 and last updated on 2026-06-16. The current verdict is 'watch' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. HKUDS/nanobot leads on workflow potential (8.6) and open-source/build quality (8.4); its lowest signal is setup ease (6.4), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned HKUDS/nanobot a composite score of 7.8 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 74.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

agent workbenches may store memory and credentials; chat/app integrations can expose private messages or files if misconfigured.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
agent-workbench mcp memory self-hosted automation
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-03T18:56:10Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

39 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-16 through 2026-08-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score7.8 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.6 current · +1.6 net
GitHub stars (observed)46,549 current · +1,192 net
GitHub stars46,549 exact observation
Versionv0.3.0
Last release2026-07-25T08:08:47Z
Maintenanceactive
Current riskconditional
Current verdictwatch
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineModel Context Protocol

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-037.89.646,549conditionalwatchactive
2026-08-027.89.646,507conditionalwatchactive
2026-08-017.89.046,485conditionalwatchactive
2026-07-317.88.0Not recordedconditionalwatchnot recorded
2026-07-307.88.0Not recordedconditionalwatchnot recorded
2026-07-297.89.646,367conditionalwatchactive
2026-07-287.89.046,321conditionalwatchactive
2026-07-217.89.045,798conditionalwatchactive
2026-07-207.89.045,798conditionalwatchactive
2026-07-197.89.045,798conditionalwatchactive
2026-07-187.89.045,798conditionalwatchactive
2026-07-177.89.045,798conditionalwatchactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 46507 → 46549.

stars changed

Stars changed: 46485 → 46507.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 46481 → 46485. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 46321 → 46367.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 46318 → 46321. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 45798 → 46318.

integration changed

Integration changed: Anthropic, Claude, Claude Code, OpenAI, OpenAI Codex → Model Context Protocol.

version changed

Version changed: v0.2.2 → v0.3.0.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 45795 → 45798. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 45793 → 45795. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 45357 → 45793.