Item detail
github.com

ruvnet/ruflo

ruvnet/ruflo is a developer tool that RepoRadar is tracking in its Agent Frameworks section, currently rated Gold tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 10.0 out of 10.

Score9.1
Popularity96.0
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity9.0
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential10.0
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for teams shipping practical multi-agent systems who need swarming, memory, and tool handoff without building everything from scratch.

Who should use it

developers building coding copilots platform teams experimenting with multi-agent orchestration builders testing practical Claude/Codex agent flows

Who should skip it

Skip ruvnet/ruflo if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.

About this signal

ruvnet/ruflo is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Agent Frameworks section. It was first seen on 2026-06-17 and last updated on 2026-06-17. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. ruvnet/ruflo leads on workflow potential (10.0) and practical usefulness (9.0); its lowest signal is setup ease (6.4), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned ruvnet/ruflo a composite score of 9.1 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 96.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

Automated agents can execute commands and touch code; keep approvals and command restrictions in place.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
agent-framework multi-agent claude codex orchestration memory
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-03T18:56:10Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

38 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-17 through 2026-08-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score9.1 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.6 current · +1.6 net
GitHub stars (observed)66,902 current · +2,647 net
GitHub stars66,902 exact observation
Versionv3.34.0
Last release2026-07-31T16:04:41Z
Maintenanceactive
Current riskconditional
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude Code, OpenAI Codex

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-039.19.666,902conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-029.19.666,803conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-019.19.066,732conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-319.18.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-309.18.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-299.110.066,455conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-289.19.066,328conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-219.19.064,743conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-209.19.064,743conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-199.19.064,743conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-189.19.064,743conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-179.19.064,743conditionaltry nowactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 66803 → 66902.

stars changed

Stars changed: 66732 → 66803.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 66702 → 66732. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 66700 → 66702. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 66698 → 66700. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

version changed

Version changed: v3.32.24 → v3.32.30.

stars changed

Stars changed: 66328 → 66455.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 66313 → 66328. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 64743 → 66313.

version changed

Version changed: v3.32.2 → v3.32.24.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 64740 → 64743. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 64737 → 64740. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.