Item detail
github.com

boshu2/agentops

boshu2/agentops is a developer tool that RepoRadar is tracking in its Agent Infrastructure section, currently rated Gold tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.7 out of 10.

Score8.2
Popularity78.0
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty9.0
Momentum7.0
Maturity8.1
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential9.7
Setup ease6.4

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for engineering leads running Claude Code or Codex on real production code who need an auditable 'is this PR safe to merge' answer, not a vibe: install AgentOps, run /discovery + /crank + /validate --mixed on a small change, and inspect the council verdict before granting the agent more autonomy.

Who should use it

engineering leads running Claude Code or Codex on production code who need an auditable validation layer platform teams that want a multi-model council before merging agent output developers who want bounded-slice planning and phase-gate evidence for their agent's work

Who should skip it

Skip boshu2/agentops if the source repository or demo is inactive, unmaintained, or no longer matches the description shown here.

About this signal

boshu2/agentops is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Agent Infrastructure section. It was first seen on 2026-06-17 and last updated on 2026-06-17. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, boshu2/agentops is strongest on workflow potential (9.7) and novelty (9.0) and weakest on setup ease (6.4) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned boshu2/agentops a composite score of 8.2 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 78.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

auto-validation can grant the agent more autonomy than the team is comfortable with — start with explicit human approval at every phase gate.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
agent-validation council claude-code codex evidence phase-gates trust
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-03T18:56:10Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

38 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-17 through 2026-08-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.2 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.0 current · +2.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)416 current · +7 net
GitHub stars416 exact observation
Versionv3.5.0
Last release2026-07-31T14:35:57Z
Maintenanceactive
Current riskconditional
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude, Claude Code, OpenAI Codex

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-038.29.0416conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-028.29.0416conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-018.29.0415conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-318.27.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-308.27.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-298.29.3415conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-288.29.0414conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-218.29.0412conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-208.29.0412conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-198.29.0412conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-188.29.0412conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-178.29.0412conditionaltry nowactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 415 → 416.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 416 → 415. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.

stars changed

Stars changed: 414 → 415.

version changed

Version changed: v3.2.0 → v3.3.0.

stars changed

Stars changed: 412 → 414.

stars changed

Stars changed: 409 → 412.