Item detail
github.com

openguardrails/agentfw

openguardrails/agentfw is a developer tool in RepoRadar's Agent Infrastructure section, holding Gold tier and a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.9 out of 10.

Score8.4
Popularity78.0
Riskconditional
TierGold
Score breakdown
Usefulness9.0
Novelty8.0
Momentum8.0
Maturity8.2
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential9.9
Setup ease8.8

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for developers running Claude Code, Codex, or any MCP-speaking agent who wants a single chokepoint to see every model call, mask secrets on the way out, and route subagents to cheaper models while the planner stays on the strong one.

Who should use it

developers running Claude Code or Codex with real API keys and wallet credentials agent platform teams that need a single observability + security chokepoint teams routing agent subagents to cheaper models while the planner stays on the strong one security-conscious users who want credential masking without adopting a vendor framework

Who should skip it

Skip openguardrails/agentfw if the source repository or demo is inactive, unmaintained, or no longer matches the description shown here.

About this signal

openguardrails/agentfw is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Agent Infrastructure section. It was first seen on 2026-06-17 and last updated on 2026-06-17. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and easy setup difficulty. The standout signals for openguardrails/agentfw are workflow potential (9.9) and practical usefulness (9.0), while evidence quality (7.2) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed. The score, tier, risk label, and verdict on this page are never influenced by sponsorship, ads, or tips — they reflect only the usefulness, popularity, novelty, momentum, maturity, and evidence signals described in the RepoRadar methodology.

How this item is evaluated

RepoRadar assigned openguardrails/agentfw a composite score of 8.4 out of 10, placing it in the Gold tier. This score combines weighted sub-signals: usefulness (35%), novelty (18%), momentum (14%), maturity (10%), open-source/build quality (7%), evidence quality (6%), workflow potential (6%), and setup ease (4%). Popularity is tracked separately at 78.0 and never affects the composite score or tier. The risk label of 'conditional' reflects inherent user-impacting hazards, not generic novelty. Items with no risk flag may still require normal code review before production use.

Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

agentfw is a security chokepoint — run it carefully during upgrades and pin versions, since a misconfigured proxy can drop or rewrite legitimate traffic.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
agent-security proxy claude-code codex mcp secrets routing firewall
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-08-03T18:56:10Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

38 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-17 through 2026-08-03; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score8.4 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum7.5 current · -0.5 net
GitHub stars (observed)95 current · +14 net
GitHub stars95 exact observation
Versionv0.11.2
Last release2026-07-11T08:39:18Z
Maintenanceactive
Current riskconditional
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineNo structured integrations recorded

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-038.47.595conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-028.47.595conditionaltry nowactive
2026-08-018.47.594conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-318.48.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-308.48.0Not recordedconditionaltry nownot recorded
2026-07-298.47.894conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-288.47.593conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-218.49.084conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-208.49.084conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-198.49.084conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-188.49.084conditionaltry nowactive
2026-07-178.49.084conditionaltry nowactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 94 → 95.

stars changed

Stars changed: 93 → 94.

stars changed

Stars changed: 84 → 93.

stars changed

Stars changed: 81 → 84.