Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Regional MCP catalogs solve real discovery for public-data agents; versioned release plus a sibling catalog signals maintained curation. Useful for French public-data agent builders, civic-tech developers.
Where this stands now
france-mcp-servers — Curated catalog of MCP servers for French public data, laws and services, tagged v1.0.0 on 2026-09-07 with a 2 ranks #11 of 12 tracked MCP Servers items by composite score (7.4 against a section median of 7.8). The section currently carries 5 Silver, 4 Gold, 3 Bronze. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-09-09 (33 days in the current window).
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Consider france-mcp-servers — Curated catalog of MCP servers for French public data, laws and services, tagged v1.0.0 on 2026-09-07 with a 2 lower priority if you already have a working solution in this category.
About this signal
france-mcp-servers — Curated catalog of MCP servers for French public data, laws and services, tagged v1.0.0 on 2026-09-07 with a 2 is tracked by RepoRadar as an AI project in the MCP Servers section. First seen 2026-09-09; the source record was last checked on 2026-09-09. The current verdict is 'watch' with a Bronze tier and review needed setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, france-mcp-servers — Curated catalog of MCP servers for French public data, laws and services, tagged v1.0.0 on 2026-09-07 with a 2 is strongest on open-source/build quality (8.4) and momentum (7.8) and weakest on setup ease (6.5) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The france-mcp-servers — Curated catalog of MCP servers for French public data, laws and services, tagged v1.0.0 on 2026-09-07 with a 2 record combines a 7.4/10 composite score with separate popularity (82.0), risk (none), and setup (review needed) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Questions worth asking before you adopt this
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
No inherent user-impacting risk is flagged from the captured evidence.